calaggie9-dec09-budgetcommunity-011210

———————————————————-

The Topic — “The Budget Cuts and the UC Davis Community”:

Rather than commenting on what type of financial measures you believe must be taken to solve our budget shortfall, a prompt which is sure to lead to a discussion dominated by how the legislature should fund the UC at higher levels, please take a few moments to share how the budget cuts have or would have affected you and your specific affiliation with the campus. To be more specific:

Students/Staff/Faculty/Administrators: How have the budget cuts affected the clubs, organizations, communities, departments, units, and other activities (including attending or paying for school) in which you are involved or serve? What is different now, both in terms of your new limitations or goals as well as in terms of new issues you have had to address?

Alumni or Associates away from Campus: Your prompt is more of a challenge, but will give us a historical perspective on this situation. Think about with what you were involved while you were at UC Davis. How might budget cuts during your time on campus have affected the activities in which you were involved?
You can include as many or as few issues/problems/positive outcomes that have resulted from the budget shortfall as you like, in as many sentence(s) as you like.

Lastly, if you have the time, feel free to also comment on what creative (in other words, nothing related to more funding, reducing tuition, etc.) short-term or long-term solutions you might have for either the specific impact you share or for tackling the entire budget shortfall itself.
NOTE: Each response has been given a heading in bold at the top indicating the topics that it covers. This is to make it easier for you to browse the document. Enjoy!

——————————————————–
PRE-MEETING RESPONSES (sent on or before December 1)
——————————————————–

Administration, Private Support

The budget cuts have caused my managers and me to rethink how we do business. We will have to lay-off some members of my team and reduce other employees’ time permanently, and we’re going to have to set aside some replacement hiring as well. Of course, I hope that our thoughtful approach will help us get through this without too much impact, but it’s difficult to downsize while at the same time having pressure to raise the profile of UC Davis and raise more private support.

________________________________________________________________

Reducing Athletic Scholarships, Athletic Program

From an alum with a “historical perspective”: A thought for budget cuts that comes to mind is a reduction of athletic scholarships or consideration of shifting the athletic scholarships to a more high school academic, leadership, activity thrust with a reduced focus on athletic capabilities. I was offered scholarships for my wrestling capabilities, but opted out as I could not foresee a life at university simply dedicated to the sport side of life and hence decided to attend UC Davis which in those days had no athletic scholarships. And, I ended up playing football and was eventually involved in the establishment of the initial wrestling team. The athletic programs at that time were popular and good without scholarships dedicated to athletics and the emphasis was on academics as it should be (that’s what universities are for - no?). My impression of sports at universities is that athletes are recruited and provided scholarships based on sport capabilities primarily with little regard to academic background in all too many cases in the USA. And, in these cases, high school level courses are created for these athletes with baby sitters assigned to get them thru the academic requirements of the university. However, I don’t believe UC Davis bows to this level, although it is food for thought.

My impression of sports is that the athletes at professional levels receive pay that is totally out of proportion with other professions, just as the pay for the financial geeks on Wall Street are out of proportion. Regardless, sports play a significant role in life and, as a previous athlete, I am a fan and supporter of sports programs (:-)!! Yet I do feel that universities must focus on the academic side of life. Therefore my thoughts are about budget reductions on the athletic programs as opposed to the academic arena.

Perhaps I am influenced by the universities in Germany where I now live. They have no sports programs and are focused entirely on academics. If a student wants to play soccer or basketball, he/she goes to a club. Sport activities are simply not a part of the university system. In the USA, sports will remain within the universities - but the emphasis should be on academics!!

_________________________________________________________________

Private Funding, Increased Student Fees, Decreased Public Service, Less Diversity

My comments about the effect of budget reductions are focused on changes that have been and are occurring currently in the basic fabric of the institution. I relay these as concerns for the future and hope that we can put in place action to retain many of the characteristics of our campus that have made us a leading educational and public service entity.

Below are some thoughts and facts on how budget constraints are influencing, in a negative way, our institution.

The Davis campus due to reduced funding will gravitate towards private and government funding, with an increase in student fees (tuition) and faculty reducing their teaching loads to service research grants, an essential aspect of the future survival for faculty.  Increasing our partnership with the private sector will restrain our commitment to public service. These subtle changes will result in more top-down administration, more lecturers in the classroom, reduced diversity due to increased student fees and decreasing collegiality; trends already in place. I relay my concerns in anticipation that the retention of the very positive characteristics of our “public” campus will be included in a vision of the future as we discuss the impact of the budget crisis.

_________________________________________________________________

Fewer Picnic Day Events, Inter-Department Collaboration

Picnic Day is a time honored tradition at UC Davis. It is known for its 150 plus events stretching from the field behind Dutton Hall to the Vet Med area. To put on Picnic Day, not only do departments put on their own events for the public, there are departments who work behind the scenes to make the event run successfully (i.e. TAPS, UCD Police, UCD Fire, Facilities and Grounds). In the past, these departments either do not charge or heavily subsidize their costs. With budget cuts, I foresee this not being able to continue. Unfortunately, this would mean putting on fewer events on Picnic Day. That would mean possibly having no animal events, not having a parade, etc.

It is unfortunate that these departments look out for their own, instead of taking the approach of working together to help each other put on one of the best events UC Davis has to offer. I hope that none of the above will happen, but it will need a lot of creative planning, and teamwork.

_________________________________________________________________

Increased tuition for certain fields, Lobby capitol & find scholarships instead of protest

My tuition has gone up and will go up significantly, especially as a non-undergraduate student. It is assumed that students in my field can afford to take out the loans for the increase because “they will make the money back.” Is this true? Hopefully. However, unlike the protesters, I have just accepted it as a fact. The UC system does not have the money to maintain the high level of education it intends to supply to the students.

It is sad to see that many of the protesters are non-students or 5th year students (or to be 5th year students). My advice to these people: graduate in 4 years and instead of protesting (something that will do absolutely nothing) look for constructive ways to make a difference (look for scholarships, write/call your elected state assemblyman, etc.)

_________________________________________________________________

Accountability, Administrative Inequality & Bureaucracy

There is no question that University staff is getting pressed more and more to do a lot more with a lot less. To some extent this is necessary, because the relative comfort of the University work environment has allowed perhaps a too “unaccountable” atmosphere. Granted, the budget cuts of the early 90’s took care of some of this, and subsequent cuts have continued the process. However, it is starting to seem like now we are reaching a point where one wonders how those in the ivory tower can expect more. In any case, the reality is there is less money and less staff. More and more, it seems like the “bosses” are delegating more and at the same time not funding lower level assistants.  Those in the middle start dropping more balls, delaying action on paperwork, and so forth - it seems like the pile keeps getting taller even though more effort is being made. It gets frustrating. To some extent you start trying to see who you can pawn tasks off on. Maybe that’s not a bad thing, in that new ways of getting things done might become evident.

_________________________________________________________________

Student Athlete Advisory Committee, Aggie Idol

For the past 3 years now, SAAC (student-athlete advisory committee) has put on the event Aggie Idol. It’s a talent show in which student-athletes perform in order to fundraise money for a charity. We’ve rented Freeborn Hall in the past and the athletic department usually helps us out with paying for Freeborn Hall. Unfortunately due to the budget cuts they were unable to pay for it last year and will not be paying for it this year either. It’s difficult to pay for the Hall as well as try to raise enough money to give to a charity. I truly enjoy putting on this event because it’s a great opportunity for the athletes to interact as well as get involved with the community since many members of the community attend the function. This year we’re going to have to really push to sell tickets so we can guarantee we’ll raise enough money to pay for Freeborn as well as raise money for a charity. Another struggle I’ve experienced in S.A.A.C. is that we have $0 as a budget and therefore organizing events with the student athletes becomes difficult. Putting on such events gets more people involved with SAAC and more enthusiastic about it. However it’s been really hard to think of creative ways to organize such events so that student athletes can interact and reach out to one another. The biggest disappointment for me at Davis is that even though we have 800 student-athletes they seem disconnected not only with one another but also with the larger student body. My hopes through SAAC were to improve these relationships, but it’s proved a difficult task, especially with no money.

_________________________________________________________________

Fundraising, Internship & Career Center, Student-Administration Communication

UC (and UC Davis) is no stranger to facing budget cuts. It comes from a lack of a consistent funding source other than state funds. Our new Chancellor is on the right path with a fundraising campaign and increased research. I was hesitant at first that this budget “crisis” would be any more different than other ones I have seen. However, this one is particularly taking its toll on staff and student services. Long-time campus departments are losing (or retiring staff) and not getting new staff. More often than not, staff are being asked to do more for less. For example, 7 full time staff and nearly 25 student staff were cut from the Internship & Career Center this year. These are big cuts that run under the radar because they are small in terms of the overall budget, but have serious effects on services for students and maintaining a program considered #1 on the West Coast. I think the administration should explain the overall budgets more with student leaders. Perhaps students can assist them in coming up with some of the creative solutions needed to get us out of these problems.

_________________________________________________________________

Advising Services & Student Housing, Cross-Campus Compromise

As far as budget cuts go, for me it has been hard seeing two of the major departments I have been involved with at Davis combined into one. Advising Services now falls under Student Housing, and that is a personal example that has affected me greatly. The overarching point, however, is that people need to be prepared to make sacrifices in a troubling economy. Budget cuts are upsetting, nobody likes them, and unfortunately they are the current reality. We need to do our best to support those aspects of campus that are important to us, while at the same time, being prepared to give a little and take a little. We are all in this together.

_________________________________________________________________

1992 Registration Fees, Thriving Within a Budget, Creative Solutions & Marketing UC Davis effectively

I graduated in 1992 in the midst of an economic slump. I sat through a boring commencement speech about how ours would be the first generation to do worse than our parents, blah, blah. 5 years later, the Internet came to fore, led in great part by our “under achiever” generation. Sure that bubble burst, in large part, but the tech boom continues and it probably will lead us out of this downturn. And plenty of my peers are doing better than their parents.

The bigger issue is the topic of your discussion, Budget. Budgets should and always will exist, both big and small. I started college during an economic boom and finished during a bust. But budget was always a concern. There was never enough money for what we wanted but plenty of money for what we needed. And we did well with what we had. Registration fees went from something like $500 a quarter to $1500 a quarter during my time. Today’s constraints are surely the toughest I’ve seen but the secret to success is living intelligently within a budget and achieving the most with what you’ve got. Don’t complain about the size or constraints of the budget, live within it successfully. And if you need more, go earn it. And when you earn it, spend it wisely. If you can lobby for it great, but we’ve got tens of thousands of creative minds on campus, and hundreds of thousands of Alumni. We ought to be able to get what we need out of what we’ve got and outperform regardless. My first donation to UC Davis went to the wrestling team after they posted the first ever UC Davis Div. 1 championship. I didn’t find this out on my own, the head coach sent me a newsletter. We’ve got achievements up the ying-yang, we ought to be able to turn that into corporate grants and Alumni contributions. Is the score board at the new stadium for sale? It wasn’t when I was there although Coca Cola offered to buy it.

Lastly, in my opinion, you won’t get much compassion, let alone money, for expressing a need for more budget these days. You’ve got to give your funders a value proposition to support your budget requirements, and you need to remind them again and again of that value. They’re not going to go out of their way to find you. And if you can produce more or better with less, you’ve got a good story. But most importantly, you’ve got a greater discipline for better economies and bigger budgets to come.

_________________________________________________________________

Student organization expenses, Department support to clubs

As a student leader of a club affiliated with a department, the biggest impact I see is that the department cannot help as they have before. A Fleet Services’ car rental in the past was easy to get sponsored, and now there is hesitancy if not outright denial. Miscellaneous expenses are difficult to get funded or reimbursed, forcing students to rethink how badly something is needed. It also seems like main office staff are busier than ever, and although they are usually helpful, one can sense they would like to be of additional help. My department generally has good morale but I can see that we are close to a tipping point. I see a major shortcoming of department chairs in terms of establishing fundraising drives and helping students connect with alumni via departmental alumni networks. I would like to see university development officers
perhaps be more proactive with individual departmental clubs to help them with this kind of activity. Of course, department chairs are research professors who typically become chair when they meet general qualifications but do not have enough research money coming in to “get out of being chair”, I am told.

_________________________________________________________________

Declining Education System, November Topic Responses, Paying Tuition in 1959, Tuition Increases

“Our [California's] public university system - which has prided itself in providing perhaps the most numerous high-quality research opportunities for its undergraduate students anywhere in the world - is now on a crash course toward its biggest decline in history.” (Professor Steve Oppenhieimer, Cal State Northridge, in the Los Angeles Times Dec. 1, 2009).

The recent discussions regarding “U.C. Davis one hundred years from now” really missed the point. At the present rate of decline along with rapidly rising costs, there will be no public university system in California one hundred years from now. I would suggest an in-depth study of what the University of California will be like ten years from now, or even 50 years from now, which is a date many of you will live to see.

Fifty years ago, I graduated from UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine with no debts (and no money). During my time at Davis (1954-1959) I never worried about tuition. For the first four years, my G.I. Bill income of $110 per month covered school costs as well as room and board at the SAE Fraternity house ($55/mo. room and board). I can’t even remember what tuition was - I didn’t worry about it. The $50 I received from ASUCD for being El Rodeo Editor was a very substantial amount. Savings from my military pay and small jobs around Davis and a small State GI bill ($50/mo. for 1 year) kicked in to allow me to finish school. After that, I went to work as a veterinarian at $400/month!
Look at the tuition rises:
1979 - $685/yr
1987 - $1,374/yr
1998 - $3,609/yr
2004 - $5,684/yr
2008 - $7,126/yr
2010 - $10,302/yr
How long can this go on?? What will tuition be in 2020?
I think a good topic would be: How can the University of California at Davis survive?

Sorry……….I think the outlook is very sad…

_________________________________________________________________

More resources/advising for Greek Life: Change from SPAC to Student Housing

From a Perspective of a member of the Greek Community, the budget cuts have been somewhat of a blessing in disguise. Greek Life for the past few years has been housed under the Student Programs and Activities Center, which was severely underfunded. This situation in effect starved the Greek Community of the proper advising and resources necessary to sustain a successful community of nearly 12% of the student population. With the mid-year budget cuts that happened this spring SPAC was cut completely, leaving Greek Life without a home. Luckily we were placed under student housing one of the few campus departments that has available funds. Because of this shake up and change in location there are now four full time employees dedicated to breathing life back into the relationship between the administration and over 71 Greek organizations. Although we lost a great resource in SPAC, the Administration was effective in ensuring that the resources students needed were still provided, and in the case of the Greek Community were provided two-fold.

_________________________________________________________________

Washington Program, Cross Departmental Collaboration, Targeted Alumni Support, Financial Planning Workshops

As a political science major and peer advisor for the department I have seen first-hand the budget cuts in action. One program in particular, the Washington Program, is in serious trouble. The Washington Program is facing significant cuts that severely threaten the program. Recently, I was speaking with the program director, Prof Larry Berman, and he described the cuts the program is facing. The program is reducing the number of students from 45 to 30, considering eliminating the faculty director (who oversees the programs research component), and reducing the number of TAs to one. These cuts are on top of previous cuts including a loss of library privileges at the Georgetown Library (an essential part of the required research project). As an alumni of the Washington Program, I’ve experienced the value of the program. Political science majors are not required to complete any research or internship as part of their major. The Washington Program provides students the chance to engage in these critical aspects of education. With the tough budget situation, I don’t know the best solution to the Washington Programs problems or the universities in general, but I feel that in small steps we can find solutions.

Some ideas:

Cross Departmental Collaboration- Many departments do not communicate with each other. Collaboration between departments could lead to better efficiency and enhance educational opportunities.

Targeted Alumni Support- Campaign for support/ scholarship donations from targeted alumni such as Greeks, former ASUCD students, former athletes, and so on. Use students currently involving in these activities to solicit responses.

Financial Planning Workshops- Offer a 1 unit p/np course to students providing information on personal finances, financial planning, and financing your education.

_________________________________________________________________

Reorganization of Student Affairs Units, Inefficiency, De-prioritization of student interests

I’ll be brutally honest. The current budget situation is frustrating. In order to save money, the campus has disbanded some Student Affairs units and placed the services in auxiliary departments. Auxiliary departments like the Campus Unions and Student Housing have had to undertake more services but the way in which they operate may not be the most effective for students. For example, the Advising Services department was disbanded. The services that were in that department remain but are under new management in either the Learning Skills Center or Student Housing. The unit, New Student Services, which was funded by the Orientation budget is now managed by Student Housing and is now called First Year Experience. Both the Orientation budget and Student Housing budgets are self-supporting (meaning the services exist off of fees from Orientation and Housing, rather than tuition or state money). Even though the Orientation was a self-supporting unit, it was part of a Student Affairs department. Therefore, the Orientation team spent a great deal of time and energy to recruit as many students to attend Orientation (i.e. bring in revenue) and more effectively spend money. They partnered with various Student Affairs units to streamline processes, make efficiencies, and collectively save money on projects that would serve us all. Now, Orientation is part of Student Housing which in an addition to being self-supporting is also an auxiliary to the campus (essentially they are their own business separate from the University). Therefore some of their decisions are not as student data driven, collaborative to other Student Affairs units, or cost saving. For example, the Transfer Orientation dates have Fridays removed for 2010 even though those were the highest attended days because Student Housing can get more money to have off-campus conferences come on campus than from having the University Orientation. But when it comes to making decisions about other items in the budget, the Orientation staff have been told “You worry too much about money and the budget.” It is frustrating to know that there are so many students who will not have access to certain programs and services, because auxiliaries who don’t always put the student first in decision making. Please note, the frustration is not at the people, it is the system in which they operate.

_________________________________________________________________

Relationship between UC students and CA Government

The cuts to the budget of the University of California have driven a stake through potential relationships between the students of the University of California and the Government of California.
Why would students who are having to pay more, for less, want to then take low-paying jobs serving California? Why would we want to work as public school teachers serving California? Perhaps our parents did this, and then sent their children to the UC, only to see fees skyrocket. Why would we want to send our children to the same University, if Sacramento’s goal is not to provide reasonably priced education for the children of California?
Now, money that I expected to put towards achieving future goals is having to be diverted to this current goal.

_________________________________________________________________

Scenario Planning Exercise

The university or perhaps interested groups should structure a scenario planning exercise. In other words, we should come up with four different scenarios for dealing with the funding crisis. All would involve reductions in support. A broad range of viewpoints should be brought together for a table-top exercise where each table has multiple constituencies represented: students, faculty, staff, alumni, unaffiliated citizens, etc. Each table would be tasked with choosing from among the scenarios and then modifying their selection as they wish. At the end, each table reports out on the scenario it preferred and the modifications made. Subsequently, a consensus team would try to find the areas of common agreement among the various tables. One scenario I would consider would be the elimination of departments with the result that their functions would evolve to the school level or broad subject level, e.g., “social sciences”, “physical sciences” etc. Good cost figures would need to be developed in advance so that potential savings could be identified to assist in the task of choosing among scenarios.

________________________________________________________________

Department support to clubs, Fundraising & Alumni Outreach

When I was a student, a club I belonged to relied on alumni to provide incredible support. But also on the department. It seemed that we could “overdraft” our departmental account, sometimes to the tune of several grand by the end of the year. Somehow, faculty would throw a little discretionary funding our way, or the chair would do so out of department funds. That is no longer the case, and in fact some basic administrative and operational support is being required to be paid by the club. I am very open to making donations, but I get turned off by the General Fund requests by everyone but my old department’s chair(s). I don’t know why department chairs can’t send out letters to alumni, asking for donations to specific parts of their department.

Frankly, I am tired of letters from higher up asking for essentially unrestricted donations. All that means to me is that the campus will use monies they had set aside for “my” interest to pay for something they want because now they have me myself paying for “my” interest. I think there needs to me much more relationship building at the departmental level by department chairs between alumni and the alumni’s clubs, faculty, or department in general.

________________________________________________________________
POST-MEETING RESPONSES (after December 1)
——————————————————–

Graduate Programs, Lobbying State Legislature, Undergraduate Decisions

I’m in a somewhat unique position concerning the budget crisis, seeing as I’m an alumnus of Davis and a current graduate student at Berkeley. Curiously, this means that I’m not affected in a very important way: I’m not paying tuition. I was fortunate enough to be awarded a fellowship that covers all my tuition expenses and provides a generous living stipend. However, I’m still concerned.

As an alumnus, I want my alma mater to be in the news for its academic accomplishments, not because it’s running out of money or because students have occupied Mrak Hall. Not that I’m condemning the students who took that action. I applaud them for taking a stand and at least bringing some attention to the issue, though I hope they’re willing to take further actions that might not garner as much spotlight, like lobbying state and federal legislators – and even family and friends – so they can understand the value of public higher education and why it should remain accessible. As a graduate student, I’m concerned that rising fees will mean fewer students for me to teach in discussion sections, and that layoffs will affect my department’s incredible staff.

So, what’s to be done, short of sparking a revolution that revokes Prop. 13 and augments a vital revenue stream? For one, my colleagues and I have been talking to the undergrads at Berkeley. If we find out that any of our students are from low-income families, we tell them about the Blue & Gold Program. We’ve been encouraging them to look into outside scholarships and grants, so that they don’t have to rely too much on student loans. I would also encourage current students to make a strong effort to graduate in four years. Think twice before registering for an elective class outside your major: you might be taking the spot of someone who needs it, and in the future, you might not be able to take a class you actually need. All of us should also get in touch with our state and federal representatives, and we should be talking to our friends and family about how important the UC system is, so that they can lobby Sacramento and Washington as well. And, we should become better informed voters, especially when it comes to ballot initiatives that require borrowing money or guaranteeing budget funds for a program. Remember that higher public education and the prison system are the two biggest pieces of the budget pie that don’t get a guaranteed percentage of funding every fiscal year; so the more that gets set away for something else, the more will be taken away from the UC, CSU and community college systems.

________________________________________________________________

Engineering, Value of hands-on experience

When I was in undergrad mechanical engineering, I spent a lot of time in the mechanical engineering and Ag Engineering shops in Bainer Hall, always more interested in the application than the theory of engineering. The time I spent in these shops, along with wrenching at Antique Mechanics, was the most valuable and memorable portion of my education at UCD. While the engineering theory and discipline I learned in the classroom was a great foundation, the shop was where I learned how machines came together and how to design. These skills gave me practical experience that has been very valuable in the workplace. I was always amazed by the quality of the staff and resources devoted to these shops and knew that it must take a significant amount of money to keep them running. Both shops were always completely spotless and had a tool or part for any project imaginable. In this time of budget cuts, I can’t help but worry that the engineering departments will make cuts to the engineering shops to preserve academic programs. I hope I’m wrong, because every engineer should have a chance at a hands-on experience before starting his or her career.

________________________________________________________________

Increasing Law School Tuition

As a law student, the budget cuts and increased tuition are going to make my final year at Davis almost 15K dollars more expensive. That is on top of an already tremendous law school debt. Fortunately, King Hall focuses on grants so I am partially covered by the generosity of the financial aid office, but the paltry grant sum is more of a gesture than a solution.

I was able to secure employment, but many of my fellow students who are extremely qualified couldn’t get a job in this horrible market. The increases will make it largely impossible for them to pay off their loans. Also, some who would have pursued jobs in public service must now seek higher paid employment in the private sector. This is terrible for graduates of the MARTIN LUTHER KING school of law - a school dedicated to service and equality.

Do I think the cost of my legal education is worth it? Maybe. King Hall is amazing. I am getting top notch instruction amidst some great minds…but will I ever pay the money back? I have no idea. No one I go to school with really knows if it’s possible. We just focus on the here and now and hope that the public law school survives this financial disaster.

________________________________________________________________

Recruiting, Tuition

With budget cuts, we don’t have the opportunity we use to. We use to travel across the nation to recruit students to come to UC Davis, now we are limited to northern and central California to recruit students.

Poem for the heck of it:

Dang you budget cuts
I hate you with all my guts
Tuition is raised
And all I could afford to eat is braised
Beef

________________________________________________________________

Staff Impact: Attrition, Projects & Tasks, Efficiency

The financial difficulties of the UC system have greatly impacted staff on campus. Annual programs and events to serve our students, faculty and staff are being put on hold indefinitely and will be potentially cut. The loss of staff members has caused the greatest change on my work responsibilities. Layoffs have not yet affected my office, but rather staffing levels are diminished due to attrition. Upon their departure, a staff member’s duties are divvied up among the remaining survivors who are now tasked with completing work that is often outside the scope and experience of their background. These projects are now being completed by someone who often does not have the skill set for those tasks and who has very little time to be trained properly for a job they hope they won’t have to do for long. While the diversity of projects is a welcome staff development opportunity, I believe that we have now met the limit of what skills can developed concurrently while still retaining the same level of quality that the University of California should be producing. At the same time, with these added tasks, there is less time for their original duties, so many projects are not being completed in a timely manner, or when it is time for their completion, they are rushed through due to a need to juggle so many different projects and things slipping through the cracks. I find that with my job, there is a lot more time being taken up with basic administrative tasks that I am required to complete because of a loss of staff members which takes away time devoted to important, but more in-depth projects. Given all of this information, I will still continue to do whatever I can to contribute to my office, as I strongly believe in the mission of the university.

________________________________________________________________

Fewer Classes, Affordability & Lost Potential, State Legislature

Admittedly, the budget cuts haven’t affected me more than the average student. In fact, they’ve probably affected me less than the average student. The clubs I am in (ASUCD, Financial Investment Club), don’t rely on school funding as much as other clubs or academic units. I am an international relations major so the largest difference I’ve noticed has been fewer classes to sign up for, which is quite frustrating. But none of this compares to students who can’t come to school now because of the increased fees.

I think the biggest effect the budget cuts have had or will have on me will be those friends of mine who can no longer afford to work towards their degrees. These bright, promising students are having to put a hold on their education and thus any contributions they may make as a result of their education. There’s no real way to measure the lost potential but I’m sure it is immense. The budget cuts haven’t affected me to any large degree but I have worked and will continue to work towards re-establishing high education funding levels in Sacramento.

________________________________________________________________

Davis Honors Challenge, Positive Publicity & Fundraising, Relay for Life & Colleges Against Cancer

When thinking about the recent budget cuts impacting our great university, it worries me how it will impact the organizations and clubs close to my heart. With faculty being stretched even thinner because of furlough days and larger class sizes, I wonder how this will impact the Davis Honors Challenge program. Will they be able to sustain the small class sizes for their honors challenge courses? I worry about how the financial situation will impact this program which prides itself on an intimate classroom setting.

At times like these, when there is a lot of negative attention for the budget cuts and student fee increases, I feel like our administration at UC Davis should try to bring more focus to all the incredible philanthropy and volunteerism. Relay For Life at UC Davis has been awarded Top College Relay in all of California for the last six years. I feel like this is an achievement that can be used as a selling point for this university.

Organizations like Colleges Against Cancer, which puts on Relay For Life at UC Davis, will most likely be around as long as there are students passionate about the cause. They will find places to meet, they will find ways to make their voices heard. The budget cuts will however impact the amount of CFC funding available and this will definitely have an impact on Relay For Life, Colleges Against Cancer, and all the other student organizations that rely on this money to help plan and put on the amazing events this campus boasts.

UC Davis has raised over $750,000 for the fight against cancer in the last 6 years. These successes are rarely highlighted. We need to rally around the amazing accomplishments going on, whether it is what the student-run clinics are doing, the success of Relay For Life, the great volunteer work through the Community Service Resource Center, and much more. Doing this not only highlights the caliber of students attending UC Davis, but it shows that we are still a university committed to helping others and it will provide a positive spotlight for our school. We alumni love any excuse to brag about our school and let’s face it, focusing on the volunteerism and successes of the student groups may even attract some donor dollars to help alleviate some of this financial burden.

———————————————————–

Notes obtained from an in-person meeting on this topic:

The meeting began by reading selected comments submitted prior to the meeting.

Speaker
How many responses were there?

Speaker
There were nineteen, total.

Speaker
Can you do me a favor and please read the prompt?

Speaker
I’d like to speak to my submission. Could you read it please?

Speaker
When I was a student, a club I belonged to relied on alumni to provide incredible support. But also on the department. It seemed that we could “overdraft” our departmental account, sometimes to the tune of several grand by the end of the year.

Somehow, faculty would throw a little discretionary funding our way, or the chair would do so out of department funds. That is no longer the case, and in fact some basic administrative and operational support is being required to be paid by the club. I am very open to making donations, but I get turned off by the General Fund requests by everyone but my old department’s chair(s). I don’t know why department chairs can’t send out letters to alumni, asking for donations to specific parts of their
department.

Frankly, I am tired of letters from higher up asking for essentially unrestricted donations. All that means to me is that the campus will use monies they had set aside for “my” interest to pay for something they want because now they have me myself paying for “my” interest. I think there needs to me much more relationship building at the departmental level by department chairs between alumni and the alumni’s clubs, faculty, or department in general.

Speaker
Is the University of California going to be public service oriented ? With more lectures, one of my favorite things is discussion. I always try to sign up for freshman seminars, even though I am not a freshman. I was reading in the California Aggie that freshman seminar instructors might be cut, and that they are asking instructors of these classes to not accept their pay. The quality of UC education is declining in subtle but sure ways, and now it is even costing much more. What is to stop students from choosing private schools over public schools, where they will soon only need to pay a little more while having a lot more financial aid to help them with their costs?

Speaker
To the point of the previous speaker; the UC will continue to be for the public; but, it will be for the wealthier public. The type of service you get at the UC is to the benefit of each spectrum of income. I think it won’t be able to serve the same populations it was founded to serve, and this will cause many people to question exactly how public of a university it is now.

Speaker
I was a faculty member for forty years, and sat through three major budget crises during that time. The trends of increasing privatization are very worrisome. Faculty do not owe their allegiance to the university anymore; when I joined the faculty I had an ownership. I was able to pursue research projects purely out of my interest in them.

Collegiality is decreasing so rapidly that everybody is an independent entrepreneur. The education that this institution strives to give is declining with these trends. I’m basically an optimistic person, but when I see more and more faculty coming in who will say, “I can’t worry about how I teach this class, I have to devote my time to finding research grants”, I fear that the trend toward privatization after each successive budget crisis will fundamentally change the way UC serves the state.

Right now, it takes about $250,000 to set up a faculty member to research. With less state funding, priorities shift and this money has to come from more private sponsorships.

Speaker
In response to some of the things previous speakers have said regarding the public nature of the UC and how it’s being jeopardized– Right now, with the UC operating on a model of high financial aid for those with high need: those with the most need will still be able to attend, but your average middle-class Californian will not. These types of fee increases are making it hard for those types of students to come here, and are probably making private schools more attractive to them. The effect of the fee increases essentially makes it possible for low-income and high-income families to afford public education, but not for moderate-income families to.

Speaker
Student allegiance to the public university and to the state of California is a very serious issue. Students see California turning its back on them; what motivation do they have to give back to society? Part of the problem with investing less in public education is that it sends a message to people that public goals are not important. It would be interesting to see how public service declines with increasing student fees.

Speaker
I have a question for a previous speaker. Were you allowed to look for grants when you did your research?

Speaker
Yes, but I had support from the university in terms of technical and lab support. It’s a little different these days, where you are expected to fund basic expenses through the grants you are able to obtain. These things are no longer covered by the university.

Speaker
I think all the things that are being said are very important. I don’t want to direct this conversation to where funding comes from. However, we should recognize that this will probably be the status quo; more often than not these trends will continue to dominate public higher education in California. You’re going to see more and more of this kind of fluctuation in funding going into the future. I don’t think it’ll go back to being like the “good old days”; rather, there will be continued divestment into UC and fees will continue increase.

Speaker
Going back to the original prompt with the effects of the budget cuts and fee increases: It has been harder for student groups, which must now pay $35 per year to establish a student account with the university. UC Davis has always prided itself on having 500+ organizations, and now the university is telling student organizations that they have to charge some sort of fee to their members or raise money another way.
In terms of student affairs, I see a lot of anger with the fees. People say that “they’re increasing our fees by 32%, where is the money going?!”. They don’t see how the money they pay is coming back to them; what little does come back is increasingly getting smaller. The frustration is good, I’ve seen a lot more people willing to take political action and willing to do something to fix California and fix the UC in these past few days than I ever have.

To tread where a previous speaker was going, even if the state had more funding it wouldn’t give it to the UC. This is because of major structural issues going on with the state. It isn’t just matter of California needing more money, it’s about California changing its priorities due to the way the political system exists. For example, the 2/3 majority required to pass a budget.

Speaker
Following up on a previous speaker’s comments about opportunity– Depending on how you look at it, the budget cuts are bringing about an opportunity to bend the rules on how things get done. I know in my own work, I am more comfortable cutting corners and getting things done. If I get busted, I can ask where people were to help me get the work done. Small instances like that can provide more ideas about how the budget cuts have affected people, but they also provide ideas about how we can change the way we do things in positive ways.

Speaker
I just wanted to pose a question to the group, as somebody who is planning on applying to medical school in the next year with the intention of going to a UC: With the changes happening to UC, how do you feel it will affect professional and graduate schools?

Speaker
There is an unknown here: We have a new chancellor. In the past, it has been easier to predict what an administration will do based on their previous actions. I’m not certain we know exactly what our chancellor will do regarding professional and graduate schools. I haven’t heard anything specifically, but she did meet with the National Academies of Sciences today. You should take a look at that story.

Speaker
On the topic of graduate and professional schools, there are two factors we must consider:

1) What will the budget shortfall do to admissions, and to the student composition of these schools?
2) How will the budget shortfall affect the schools themselves?

I do not expect much change, because most of these schools are profit-driven organizations. For instance, the med center’s furloughs are much different than those of the Davis campus. Their furloughs are about keeping the hospital as open for as much as possible; ours are about limiting hours as much as possible. In terms of fees, I know that King Hall’s fees will go up significantly over the next few years.

My question back to you: How will this affect people who want to go into the public sector in the long run? It’s possible to take on more loans, but they will be discouraged from going into public service if it does not pay as much as private practice. People have to repay their loans and debt, and it is easier to do this while working in the private sector.

Speaker
I think one of the unfortunate things that will come out of this budget crisis is the publicity for UC. I knew about the fee increases and budget shortfall, but I didn’t know about the protests until I turned on CNN and other news networks the day after. I can understand why students are upset about the fees, and I sympathize with them, but I am worried that people in Chicago or New York or elsewhere will look at these protests and not look at them favorably.

I hope that people will learn more about this situation when they hear about it, and take it at more than how it appears on face-value. However, I think that there will be a lot of backlash to the student movements on campus; people see our students breaking the law and ruining buildings. Protests only look favorable when you agree with the cause, a lot of people might not know too much detail to be able to evaluate it fairly.

Speaker
I think there’s good and bad with this situation. It is important for students to express their sentiments regarding the fee increases, and they surely are doing that recently. At the same time, it is also important for students to remain mindful of the fact that they represent the University of California, and that their actions can be interpreted by others in ways that might hurt it in the long-run. To some extent, we rely on the public support of those onlookers outside the UC system, and it is important that they do not think of us negatively because of the protests.

Speaker
I was also going to make a point about the images that our protesting might convey to people outside of UC. Is anybody familiar with the University of Michigan model, just with a show of nods? Basically, they created out-of-state quotas (around 25% to 35%) to drastically increase their revenue. They were obviously and without shame lining up out-of-state tuition as additional funding for students, and basically shutting out in-state students because the state was not providing them adequate funds.

Speaking to what a previous speaker said, it would be particularly ironic if the protests deterred potential out-of-state students from coming to the University of California. It would effectively go against what the administrators want in terms of revenue, because at some campuses there have been more of a push toward targeting and enrolling more out-of-state students. We spoke about the UC’s ability to attract its own residents away from private schools, but I think we should also consider how our developing image may make it difficult for us to attract the additional out-of-state residents we are targeting.

Speaker
A previous speaker talked about finding research grants. One of the things I’ve noticed is that in my department we are reaching across various departments to put on teams for research proposals. I’m not sure if that’s due to UC Davis being a major national agricultural program. That was one thing I thought was interesting, and perhaps something that other departments across campus should try.

Another comment I wanted to make was on furloughs, as a part-time staff person it is funny that I am subject to the furloughs. For some of us, it is an opportunity to get our work done more efficiently and on time. If nobody thinks I’m supposed to be at my desk, I’m likely to work better and quicker. I have less distractions, in other words.

Lastly, I actually heard something about what the Chancellor had in mind and can speak to that. She is planning on spending $1 million in California lottery tickets. I’m just kidding! But, you have to think that somebody’s thought about it, right? What would the chances be? One out of thirteen?

Speaker
It’s about 8:00 now, so that’s probably a good note to finish on. Thank you everybody for coming to the meeting despite it being the last week of instruction, and for submitting all these responses to our topic. Good luck with your finals!

Please feel free to submit follow-up comments at any time, via registering on this website or by sending an email to calaggie9@gmail.com.  They will be added to the top of this list.  Thank you to ALL for participating.

“UC Davis In Its Next 100 Years.” - What immediately comes to mind when you think about UC Davis in its next century?  What will be some of the university’s main challenges, and what will be some of its main accomplishments?  In what areas will UC Davis experience the most growth or change, and in what ways will it stay true to the university’s culture and tradition of the past 100 years? Where will UC Davis be in 2109, and what will its legacy be?

NOTE: Each response has been given a heading in bold at the top indicating the topics that it covers. This is to make it easier for you to browse the document. Enjoy!

Post-Meeting Responses (sent after November 10)

_____________________________________________________________________________

Curriculum, Agriculture, Funny

- 100 yrs ago, Davis was a 1 (2?) year farm program, I can’t help but think the proliferation of bachelor’s degrees and the move towards masters degrees as the standard in the working world will require a change to the education format.  Given the evolution at Davis more than most schools, and the opportunities to provide more hands on experience, I’d look to see new programs that blend undergrad, grad, and vocational experiences into 1 accelerated program.  Either that or we bulldoze Berkeley for more farm land.

- Given that land used for agriculture in the US hasn’t increased from 50 years ago, there will continue to be a push towards agricultural productivity/efficiency.  Davis sits in a seat to either shy away from agriculture because it’s not sexy, or dedicate the financial and land resources to becoming the research powerhouse.

- First year students will still screw up bike circle traffic.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Campus

Look at Mrak Hall Drive.

Sorry I can’t add more – I don’t have much time, I’m an Aggie…

_____________________________________________________________________________

Research, Private Investment, Funding

UC Davis, the UC system, and government at all levels will have become far more entrepreneurial as they wish to survive, compete, and grow.  UC Davis will develop a world-class research park, along with private investors and the scientific community focused on alternative energy, bioscience, space exploration and colonization.  The research park will be an very good example of business and academic collaboration — which will be sorely needed without those former annual ‘fat-checks’ from state and federal government that by 2109 will be long gone.

____________________________________________________________________________

General

UCD will be way more than one can even imagine!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Leader in Sustainable Agriculture

In the last 100 years we modernized agriculture to feed a growing population and electrified every corner of the country, but the methods we use to create food and power are not sustainable. In the next hundred UC Davis will take the lead in the re-invention of agriculture and energy. UC Davis will be widely known for these achievements as well as its dazzling antique tractor collection!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Sense of community, UC Davis as a unique challenge & experience for students, UC Davis identity compared to other schools

What is most exciting to me about the future of UC Davis is something that is at the core of its past and present - its focused, proud, and determined excellence in higher education in a unique locale that breeds friendship, camaraderie, and loyalty.  I saw UC Davis create loyalty in a diverse range of students, staff and faculty, not just to the school as an institution, but also to the school as an ideal.  Bringing tens of thousands of motivated students to a former farming community, then Ag school, and now general campus, has been quite the successful experiment.  Davis, for many students, is the perfect place to experience college, and therefore forms a common bond among those students that lasts in a truly special way.

Throughout the campus there is no one single thing that comes to mind that unites people’s varied interests, goals and desires.  Sure, we have Picnic Day, Aggie Football in the fall, Quad Battles, and great professors in every department.  But I don’t think any one of these things on its own makes Davis.  Instead, it is the fact that every fall over about 5,000 students buy in to the college experience.  They are challenged academically in the way that we expect from the University of California, the best public university system in the world.  But those students, mostly 18-year-olds, who arrive in September every year are also challenged personally - individually but also collectively.  They’re not thrown into an enclave within a major metropolitan area.  Nor are they comfortably among cushy suburbs.  Davis surrounds them with a radically different environment than almost all of them have grown up in.  Certainly, as we move forward and even more of Davis’s students will be coming from cities and suburbs, this effect will happen on an even greater scale.  Students will know that for the next 4 or 5 years, or longer, if they choose to stay and work on campus or pursue a graduate degree here, they are Davis.  They are the university, the town, the environment, the “brand.”  When I visit other campuses, or talk to friends who attended them, that loyalty typical of a Davis alum often doesn’t come through.  They sometimes seemed to be more fans of the school - proud of their alma mater’s sports teams or U.S. News & World Report ranking - than identify themselves as part of the fabric of the school itself. What has made Davis so special for its first 100 years - reflected in the passionate loyalty of the Cal Aggie Marching Band-Uh, the bright, young students, the athletes, tour guides, and Aggie Packers, is exactly what will make it special for the next 100 years.  And it’s something Aggies far and wide can be proud of and excited about: Aggie Pride.

_____________________________________________________________________________

World-Recognition, Funding, Reconfiguration

UC Davis has become, in a relatively short period of time, a world-recognized university.  The single best indication of this is its invited membership in the Association of American Universities, but there are many other signs of this high quality.

The twenty-first century is beginning with difficulties owing to California’s inability to continue to fund higher education well.  Changing priorities and its financial difficulties are the major detractors from the highly valued University of California we’ve known for 100 years.

But these problems are soluble problems.  We will first recognize that the state - and UC Davis - must think “reset.”  That is, short-term full recovery is not possible.  We will reconfigure, then work our way back, with less money but remarkable ingenuity, to the high quality we expect of California and Californians.

_____________________________________________________________________________

General, Tradition

A top tier public University with a reputation for excellence and steeped in tradition.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Disappearing Traditions

I think that if Davis follows our current track during the next 100 years our school traditions will be lost.  We have already lost the Bonfire, the yellow CA on the Water Tower and many other traditions. In order to grow in our future we need to keep our past and honor our traditions.

____________________________________________________________________________

Fundraising

Brilliant [$1 billion] Campaign.

____________________________________________________________________________

International Recognition

By 2109, UC Davis may be referred to internationally as UCD because the word Davis won’t be needed, or it’ll just be Davis because the UC won’t even be able to afford its own naming rights. We’ll be simply D-Aggies.

____________________________________________________________________________

Global Leader, Arts and Humanities, West Village, Athletics, Value of UC Education, Funding/Student Fees

Over the next 100 years, I believe that UC Davis will build upon its role as a trailblazing institution focused on issues that reflect the needs of our community in both local and global capacities. It is my understanding that the relatively new group of administrators on the
system and campus levels intend to foster UC Davis’ global presence, which is a valuable mission.  It will be key that UC Davis is on the cutting edge of research and development that focuses on creating a greener, more hospitable, and just-verdant world. It is also my hope
that niche areas of study are not sacrificed to achieve this goal.

The disbanding of programs and departments like Clothing and Textiles is a sacrifice of diversity at our university, and a detrimental loss to those fields of study. This is an example of the systemic loss of appreciation and development of the arts and humanities. It is crucial
that institutions of higher education take a stand in defense of fields of study relating to the arts as K-12 continues to eliminate these programs from our schools. UC Davis should also be a pioneer on this front.

The addition of West Village and the expected rise in the reputation of our athletics programs is an exciting development to witness as an undergraduate and now an alumnus. I look forward to returning home to witness the Aggies tromp the Hornets and Mustangs on an annual basis.

Projects like this are often scowled at by the students who associate these seemingly extravagant ventures with our budget shortfalls and hikes in student fees. Unfortunately, that association is incorrect. While the impending fee hikes may prove to be a dangerous hurdle when maintaining a socio-economically diverse body of students, the cost of education in the UC system is a relative bargain compared to other universities. The main grievance most students should concern themselves with is hyper-inflation and the inability to forecast the
costs of their education. We must come to terms with the times and find a solution that does not result in a doubling of student fees over the course of one generation of students. This is the UC’s impending hurdle.

Despite budgetary issues, I believe that the UC is headed on the right path. In 2109, I trust that UC Davis will still be following its mission to feed the minds and shape the actions of our future leaders.

____________________________________________________________________________

Gender, Athletics, Diversity, Funding/Student Fees

By 2109:

Society will have completely different gender roles and norms. Little girls will be raised in such a way that they are not discouraged from having an interest in playing football. It will no longer be seen as a male sport. The interest in women’s football will be so normal in the 22^nd century that there will be both men’s and women’s football teams at the high school and college levels (much like basketball). The UC Davis Women’s Football team will have won the national title at least four times, and will be a national powerhouse – both while being a perfect example on campus of Aggie Pride.

UC Davis (and UCLA, which beat us to it) will set a trend for the rest of the country by having one male and one female mascot; Gunrock (who will no longer look like a blue crocodile) and his female counterpart will travel with the Band-uh to all Men’s and Women’s football games.

UC Davis will also be looking to earn its 50^th national championship in one of its 37 intercollegiate sports (Rugby, Women’s Football, Men’s Volleyball, Men’s Lacrosse, Men’s Gymnastics, Men’s & Women’s Ice Hockey, Men’s Field Hockey, Bowling, and Hovercraft Polo have been added to the 27 it had in 2009). The Linda Katehi Sports Center, located in what was formerly undeveloped land to the east of campus, will have all the facilities necessary for UC Davis’ many sports. We will have very generous donors behind each of these Athletics initiatives.

The Davis and UC Davis community will look entirely different. Davis will continue to be a small town (relatively), but its racial and ethnic composition will be much more diverse. A trip to downtown will be a multilingual experience; you will hear all types of languages and accents as you walk pass the intersection of 9^th and O Street. The UC Davis student body will be equally diverse. The Cross Cultural Center will have a grander home in the Memorial Union, and will set an example for the nation in the way it helps students appreciate attending the most diverse university campus in the world. Across the hall from the Cross Cultural Center will be the International Scholars and Study Abroad Center (ISSAC).

Undergraduate education will be viewed as a partnership between the student and the state of California. Students will not be treated like customers and education will not be treated as a product to be purchased. Rather, higher education will be guaranteed to all students who seek it; students will pay for what they can and public funds will pay for the rest. Taxpayers will understand that the return on investment in students’ futures for society is very worthwhile.

Go Ags!

Pre-Meeting Responses (sent on or before November 10)

_____________________________________________________________________________

Academics, Athletics

UC Davis’s leadership in research, teaching and service continues to grow and gain even more international prominence as a truly preeminent center of learning.  (And, Aggie Athletics is a real force in the national NCAA Division I playoff scene—-of course!)
_____________________________________________________________________________

General

I believe UC Davis continues to evolve and grow in all facets. Whether Academics, Scientific Innovation, Athletics, The Arts, or Student Life, UC Davis will impact lives across the country and around the world.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Agriculture, Rankings

I believe in UC Davis, not just as an educational institution but as the spirit of our great state of California.
The spirit of California is founded in agriculture and it is of the utmost importance that we at UC Davis recognize this.  In this recognition comes an appreciation of all that has been discovered and created as well as a desire to better ourselves. We are blessed to have the resources at our fingertips to launch our university and the state of California into greatness.  I personally don’t think UC Davis gets the credit it deserves.  Unfortunately we live in a world that is obsessed with rankings and critical acclaim, so the quality of our dear university seems to be evaluated by U.S. News & World Report where we come in at a sad 42nd.  I like to rationalize the rating to my family, friends and colleagues by saying that we’re 42nd because there was a mistake with submitting the data.  But in truth, if the university wasn’t careful enough the send in the correct data, UC Davis wasn’t worthy of a higher rating. I believe in UC Davis.  I firmly believe that we need to respect our roots.  We were founded as the University Farm and we must remember that agriculture is noble.
I see UC Davis as the hub of agricultural research and practical application in 100 years.  Perhaps not trying to excel in everything, but focusing on what it does best. Agriculture.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Agriculture

The University of California, Davis, as part of the UC System AND part of the Land Grant College system, will remain one of the premier AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITIES in the world.  Top flight teaching, extension, and research in ag production and utilization will be an ongoing priority focus of the entire campus, including administration and allocation of resources / budgeting.  This will be taken forward system wide, and to the Legislature and people of the State of California.  All the above will be in the finest tradition of UCD’s founding precepts and first hundred years.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Funding

Privatized university. In the next 100 years, the state tax payers, largest companies, and legislators will continue to deprive our campus of funding.  But, more importantly the K-12 will continue to under educate and matriculate under prepared students forcing the UC to spend millions on remedial education.  I expect more for-profit programs (masters/professional degrees) and hopefully fewer undergrads and more UC and CSU campuses/online programs.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Research/Teaching, Funding

Clearly UC Davis has had a profound impact on business and agriculture in California over the past 100 years.  The question is how much of that is related to the research done on campus and how much is a result of the well educated grads going out into California bringing what they learned and enriching the community.

Let me make it more specific: How important is the research done by professors - funded by research grants - versus the importance of actually teaching undergrads? Which has benefited the overall community more - research or teaching?

As a follow up, in an environment of tremendous budget restrictions and administrative furloughs for both staff and faculty - which should receive the greater focus?  Teaching or research?  The direction of the University for the next 100 years starts this year.  Is UC Davis going to be a university known for the quality of the education received or for the innovation derived from research?  Both are important.  But what is the mission of the University of California at Davis?  Are the students getting what they are paying for?

_____________________________________________________________________________

Sustainability, Mentorship

The campus has already stated the next period of UC Davis is “The Sustainable Second Century”- that is the theme and slogan from University Communications and the Office of Administration, Resource and Management.  I think it would be interesting to find ways that we could support that vision and brainstorm ways that UC Davis could reach that goal.

In meetings I’ve shared with our Chancellor, another theme for the next hundred years is one of mentorship.  She has focused on this in her own career and finds it very valuable for the entire campus community.  So in what ways can there be greater opportunities on our campus for staff mentoring, faculty mentoring and student mentoring?

We can only grow stronger by empowering our own, and mentorship in my experience has been a precious gem I wish I would have begun back when I was a student.  There could be ways for us to have even more mentorship opportunities between our own members.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Transfer Students

My comment is simply about the change in freshmen and transfer students being admitted.  We know the campus is slowly reducing the number of freshmen admitted and increasing the number of transfers. While this creates small ripples now, I’m always thinking about what this could mean for the campus 5-10 years from now.  Will UC Davis become a commuter campus?  How will the campus change if a great majority of students are only here for 2 years?  Personally I don’t think the campus has put out enough services to assist transfer students but is working to get there.  But I do find it interesting that while some campuses are moving towards being more like UC Davis now (i.e. Sac State), UCD is changing its student composition.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Sustainability

When I think of UC Davis over the next 100 years, I envision Davis as a crucial component, link, in the connection of our ever developing, industrializing world and the agricultural processes that sustain it.
It will be on the forefront of balancing environmental sustainability, social sustainability and fiscal sustainability.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Community

UC Davis is unique in that it is a top University still located in a small(ish) town, one dominated by college students.  If we can keep that identity, and continue providing top-notch education and community feel to the children of California at rates they can afford, this will continue to be one of the top colleges in the nation, and indeed can improve upon its current ranking.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Funny

In 2109, UC Davis will sit in the center of the 40-million population SF-Reno metropolitan area. Davis and its sister campuses (UC Stockton, Rocklin, and Colusa) will host 270,000 students among them.  UCD will continue to be a major research center.  Also, in 2109, ASUCD will begin the 37th remodeling of the MU, marking 127 years of continuous construction on a single building.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Language

Faculty and staff of most UC campuses, including Davis, will be required to speak and understand the Spanish language.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Funding, Traditions, Identity

UC Davis In Its Next 100 Years:
Budget: I know budget is something everyone thinks about.  With budget cuts, where will our funding come from?  What will major fundraising do to our identity?  How will it shift the way we’re seen by prospective students, current students, alumni and donors?
Traditions: As the Bonfire has been disbanded, what will happen to our traditions?  What traditions are still alive?  What traditions will we fight for?  What new traditions will be created?  (Example: Back to School Weekend - for alumni and community members, Parent and Family Weekend for parents of UC Davis students, etc.)
Identity: What will UC Davis be known for in 100 years?  Still Ag?  Bio Sci?  What about the arts?  I know those are all questions, so I guess in addition to a few questions, here are some sentences:
“I wonder about UC Davis’ future.  To see where we’ve come from in 100 years is beyond outstanding and awe-inspiring.  Such tradition, such history, such pride and community.  And yet within the past few years, I feel so much has shifted dramatically.  Not for the bad, but is it for the absolute best?  I hope to see UC Davis in 10 years as a campus, an institution that I am proud of, one that I can relate to, one that doesn’t forget where it came from and doesn’t get lost in its growing identity.  One that is representative of all the small things that makes it what it is today.  The next 10 years, and the 10 after that and the 10 after that are what will shape the history of the next 100 years to come.”

_____________________________________________________________________________

Sustainability, Funding, Teaching, Research/Technology, Agriculture

What comes to mind when I think of UC Davis in its next century… I think about how the campus is physically changing with all the new buildings, especially the effort made to build “green” LEED certified buildings, like the new winery, dorms and other projects I have heard of.  I think UC Davis will face many challenges in the next 100 years regarding funding and student fees, however I believe UC Davis will work it out and continue to provide an excellent education to its students, leading research in the scientific community and many more innovations.  To think of how much UC Davis has changed in the last 15 years let alone the last 100 leads to many possibilities as to where we will end up.  It is my hope that UC Davis continues to thrive, keeps its character of a small college town, and opens new doors in research and innovation.  I see that it will become much more technologically advanced in all aspects of operation, research and teaching.  HOWEVER I strongly hope that UC Davis will keep true to its agricultural roots that it was founded on in the next 100 years.  As farming is threatened so much in today’s world I hope that UC Davis can help to preserve and advance today’s farming into the next century as well.

_____________________________________________________________________________

General

U.C. Davis will be the top public university in the country.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Student Accessibility, Agriculture, Corporate Sponsorships

It is very difficult given the current climate, to think about the next 100 years in the future of UC Davis.  So many students are struggling just to make it through the NOW.  I believe that there are some crucial decisions that will be made this year - and in the near future - that will have long term effects on UC Davis, especially around issues of accessibility.  The people that have access to a UC Davis education now will directly affect what a UC Davis Degree means 100 years on.  Another interesting thing to look at when we consider the future is how close we will choose to stay to our roots as an Agricultural university.  In recent years, as majors within the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences were restructured, the word “agriculture” was removed from many of the titles.  This is an interesting shift that seems to have been made for aesthetic purposes?  I have seen widely differing perspectives on the extent to which we market UC Davis as an Agricultural university as well, all of which will determine the future of the University.  One last thing is the extent to which we will allow corporate sponsorships at the University (the recent US Bank agreement for example), and how these will be used.  Chancellor Katehi has stated on several occasions that she sees UC Davis rising in the rankings; is this one of the things that is going to ultimately help us get there?

_____________________________________________________________________________

Funding, Accessibility, Curriculum, Campus

The first thing that comes to mind is not just what UC Davis will look like, but what will our structure of public education look like? This last century saw the master plan for higher ed, which gave the UC
extraordinary value and placed it at the pinnacle of our public system here in California. Will the next 100 years be marked by the inevitable privatization and increasing commercialization of the academic into a simple good to be bought and sold to the highest bidder? Or will we reinvest in our education, fight to maintain access for all, and preserve the diversity of thought and experience, of focus on academics and the proud variety of outside activities. As we look forward to further investment and growth in our biological
sciences and engineering departments, we must make sure we do not leave our social sciences and ethnic studies behind. As we appraise with pride our new stadium, health building, and community center, we
must pause to reflect on the students who will never use these sparkling facilities, not next year nor in ten or even a hundred, because they face the insurmountable challenge of double digit fee increases, with no relief in sight.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Agriculture

We would like to see UC Davis focus on agriculture, and related sciences, over the next century.
We will be watching…..

_____________________________________________________________________________

Sustainability

-How can the campus take the lead (in front of other institutions) in the area of sustainability?
-What will higher ed teaching be like in 100 years…all in some online format?  If so, how will we engage students?
-How can we position ourselves to continue to be a cutting edge leader in 25, 50, 75 and 100 years?
Just imagine what those 100 years ago thought about life in 2010 for UC Davis.  I doubt they could have ever imagined a Facebook, Twitter or even a television…

_____________________________________________________________________________

General

For some time, UCD has lived in the shadows of its renowned siblings, yet still found ways to make a name for itself.  As the school continues to grow, its accolades will further prove and distinguish it as one of the nation’s greatest universities.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Research, Athletics & Pride, Affordability

“I foresee UC Davis continuing to head down the path of world class research, which leads to novel discoveries with Aggie professors/researchers at the helm.  This would be my optimistic view of the next 100 years.  I actually believe this will come to pass because I tend to see things as the cup being half full.  If I were a pessimist, I’d be very concerned that the continuation of educational budget cuts at the state level and ever-increasing tuition costs for students will start a bevy of problems that will result in UC Davis becoming as costly as a tier 1 private school with the quality of professors and education of a tier 2 teaching school.

“I played football at UC Davis and was lucky enough to be a captain during my senior year.  The week prior to playing Sac State, the captains of both teams go to the annual Causeway luncheon.  This luncheon is attended by lots of people: media, fans, coaching staff, old Aggies and old Hornets.  One of the Hornets captains was not present at the luncheon and Sac State’s coach played it off as he being unable to make it to the luncheon due to the rigors of a Sac State education.  In reality this one particular captain was
injured and the coach did not want him limping around for everyone to see.  Everyone at the luncheon knew this.  Their coach also mentioned that unlike at UC Davis, professors and not TAs taught the classes at Sac State.

Bob Biggs spoke after the Sac State coach was at the podium.  He admitted that TAs did teach some classes at UC Davis, but that was primarily because our professors were busy doing the research to write the books that professors at Sac State were using to teach their classes.  I was so proud to be an Aggie that day.  It exemplified that, yes, UC Davis is not perfect; but in spite of our imperfections, we strive to be the best around.

“I would hope that 100 years from now a UC Davis football captain could witness a similar scene at the annual Causeway luncheon.  I would hope that the professors/researchers at UC Davis could still be paid competitive salaries, so that a UC Davis education would be indistinguishable from the Stanfords of the world.  At the same time, I would hope that the UC Regents would decide to decrease student tuition when times are not as tough, so that the cost of a UC Davis education would be distinguished from the Stanfords of the world.”

_____________________________________________________________________________

Business, Admissions standards, General

Since graduating in 1992, I see UC Davis emerging as a top tier brand of its own.  Last Century, UC Davis seemed a respectable, yet distant cousin to the likes of Berkeley and UCLA.  We’ve had a productive and impressive 100 year run but I think the next 100 years will be the breakout Century for the Ags.  Just today, I was working on a business deal with a new and leading high tech firm.  2 of the 8 members of that executive team, including the Chairman/CEO were UC Davis grads.  My own firm’s executive team also includes 2 former Ags.  The deal was coordinated by yet another former Ag.  I’m very proud to be an alum who probably couldn’t get accepted to UC Davis by today’s standard–a dubious honor I suppose.  But I’m encouraged by and supportive of pushing the standard higher.  During my tenure, the UC Davis brand seemed one of quiet competence.  And in the next 100 years, the social, academic, and athletic achievements that spawn from our understated university will speak loudly for themselves–and on the world’s stage!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Funny

Dominant UC campus…
Berkeley and UCLA flooded by inland tides due to Global Warning/Climate Change.
UC Davis makes latest discoveries in food and fiber propagation on Mars and beyond…
El Rodeo (campus year book) re-instituted and uses new brain implant technology!
Ags beat Sac State for straight 96 years!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Research, Public Service, Athletics, Pioneering Sprit

On the occasion of our bicentennial we will celebrate and reflect on another century of fabulous contributions from UC Davis researchers and alumni.  We’ll look back on the number of Nobel Laureates who followed in Dan Sperling’s ever-shrinking carbon footprint.  We’ll revel in the number of Rhodes Scholars our campus produced while we were climbing up the Washington Monthly’s annual rankings of the schools that do the most for society.  Our Athletics program will have been a member of the Pac-12 for so long that no one will remember when we weren’t part of that august group and our Hall of Fame will sport seven Division I Director’s Cups, eclipsing our previous total during the Division II era.  One thing that won’t change is the pioneering spirit that still will have Aggies around the globe, and throughout the cosmos, searching for the next great breakthrough to catapult society ever upward with the motto “Let There Be Light” as their mantra!
GO AGS!

_____________________________________________________________________________

General

UCD in its next 100 years will continue to gain national respect as one of the more prestigious and impressive universities while remaining the secret gem of the UC system.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Athletics, Academics, Agriculture

A continued commitment to academic and athletic excellence: that is what I want from UC Davis in the next 100 years.  We have accomplished much, but we cannot afford to rest on our laurels.

I want to see Aggie Stadium built up to its maximum capacity, and have every home game be a sell out.
I want us to continue to dominate our friends from the other side of the Causeway.
I want us to challenge Stanford for the Director’s Cup.
I want our four undergraduate colleges to keep attracting the best young minds that California has to offer.
I want our university leaders to get their heads out of the sand and help find a solution to the budget crisis, so that the doors of the university are always open to those who want to walk through them.
I want the vet school to continue to be the best in the country.
I want us to revolutionize the world of agriculture…again.
I want us to celebrate our agricultural roots, and not relegate them to the status of a quaint relic from a bygone era.
I want the rest of the country to recognize us as one of the crown jewels of the UC system.
I want to do my part to make sure the next 100 years are better than the last.
And I hope that everyone affiliated with the university is willing to put in the work as well.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Research, Tradition

Winston Churchill said, “The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.”  UC Davis over the last 100 years has built a solid foundation as a research institution with an emphasis on Aggie Pride and tradition.  I am confident UC Davis will continue to grow, enabling ground breaking developments in agriculture, engineering, medical sciences and much more. Go Ags!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Agriculture

I’d imagine 100 years from now Antique Mechanics and the Germaplasm Repository would be the only vestiges of agriculture remaining on campus, rendering “Go Ags” a sad irony.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Funding, Teaching, Research, Identity, Lobbying

I’m most concerned about UCD being able to sustain its educational excellence and to recruit top-notch professors, researchers, and administrators.  The state budget cuts have shown that the UCs need to start looking in other directions for funding.  It would probably be in UCD’s best interest to build up an endowment to attract faculty and students.

I hope that UCD can keep its “small college town” feel and Ag quirkiness (i.e. the renovated hog barn, antique mechanics, dairy on campus).

I’d like to see UCD more involved in the state Capitol since it’s right down the road.  It’s presence in Sacramento in areas other than the medical center is underwhelming even when there’s an abundant alumni community.

I’m excited to see how the 100-year agriculture project turns out.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Sustainability

The leader of all things sustainable!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Technology

No wires, tires or pliers in 2109!

_____________________________________________________________________________

Tradition, Student Attitudes, Semester System

Unless Aggies keep our traditions alive (and the true meaning of integrity and pride in academics), we may look more like a clone of Univ. of Michigan or any other mega-U in the next hundred years.  More pressure to succeed and more information to ingest mean more stress and less time for non-essential interaction.  I think we’re already seeing this syndrome in our graduate student population.  Maybe we’ll follow Berkeley (yet again) and return to the semester system…who knows?  It could provide a slower pace and deeper appreciation of college-level work.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Research, Internationalism, Athletics

UC Davis is a jewel in the crown of the University of California.  Through its interdisciplinary approach to learning and intellectual discovery through research, it is setting the bar for the next generation of important research outcomes that will help transform society into a more peaceful and healthy existence.  Already we host the fourth most international scholars in the US and that number will continue to increase in the next century, placing collaborators worldwide to work with UC Davis faculty and students on the most pressing societal issues.

On a facilities front, an International Center will be constructed on campus that will house 600 students [half domestic and half international], along with a café open to the public with international cuisine, newspapers, music, etc.  It will have space for holding lectures and forums that will push the cultural, religious, political and other barriers to thoughtful discussion and listening.  It will also house the services necessary for UC Davis students to study abroad and international students to study at UC Davis.

On the athletic front, the women’s basketball team will become a consistent contender for a position in the NCAA post-season tournament.

Thanks for this opportunity to look into my crystal ball for the next century.

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

Register/Login to add your comment directly.
Or, email CalAggie9@gmail.com.
Your comment will be added anonymously to a growing compilation.
“UC Davis In Its Next 100 Years.” - What immediately comes to mind when you think about UC Davis in its next century? What will be some of the university’s main challenges, and what will be some of its main accomplishments? In what areas will UC Davis experience the most growth or change, and in what ways will it stay true to the university’s culture and tradition of the past 100 years? Where will UC Davis be in 2109, and what will its legacy be?

calaggie9-oct08-haiku for 3-page PDF as of 11/08/08.

****************************************

Century of growth
Progress with diversity
Tradition maintained

Davis decades, ten
Undergraduate years, four
Aggie Pride, priceless

Ready the sling shots
Mix of fear and excitement
Tube socks fill the sky

The ghosts of Toomey
Have a new place to dwell at
Aggie Stadium

Hut, nineteen oh eight
Hut, twenty oh eight, blue, gold
Hike, goes long. …Touchdown!

Cheering Aggie fans
One hundred years and counting
Bleeding blue and gold

Across Davis Quad
the fall afternoon sunlight
warms my “what if” thoughts

River runs through it
Kind of, algae laden pond
Quacking hilly lawn

Bicycles en masse
Century old tradition
Crashing in circles

Aggies Beat Sac State
An annual tradition
Like Sun rotation

Aggie tradition
One hundred years of learning
Just the beginning…

Fresh dew on the ground
Racing around Toomey Field
Its more quiet now

Halftime, what’s in store?
Is that a whole pizza pie?
Can I have a slice?

Davis blue and gold
The spirit within us all
A place I call home

Davis Aggie Pride
It runs through each one of us
And will never fail

Friends of blue and gold
Alma mater’s story told
A century old

The harvesters roll
Through valley tomato fields
Thanks to Aggie thoughts

Aggie Stadium
Alive with new Aggie Pride
next century starts

Alma mater love
Hundred year institution
Aggies plow future

Picnic Day arrives
People come from far and wide
Celebrate the scene

Aggie Pride lives here
Wear your Aggie blue and gold
Go Ags beat Sac State

Eggheads glistening
The arboretum blooming
Watertowers glow

UCD Aggies
One hundred years and counting
Growing world leaders

Fistulated cow
Things you never thought you’d see
Picnic Day special

Best years of my life
Academics, sports and bikes
UC Davis pride

Duck duck duck duck goose
Roosters chickens cross the road
Cars stop but bikes don’t

Faculty, students
Knowledge created and shared
Knowledge goes forward

Dairy on campus
Next to the dormitories
Got Smell? And fresh milk

Perched by the hundred
Crows in the dense trees; you clap!
And like rain, they crap

Let there be light since
Davis’ birth, 100
Years service to Earth!

Davis Campus taught
one hundred years of students
thinking skills they sought

Oak trees line the Quad
Lazy day warmed by the sun:
Oh, Shi_! My Chem test!

Centennial signs
UC Davis party time
Aggies on my mind

UC Davis rules
Aggies passionate and cool
Great old land grant school

CoHo and the Quad
Summer concerts in the night:
Good times at Davis.

501 Russell
One year; lifetime memories
A greek life well lived.

Backpack through Europe
A post-grad journey well-earned
Aggie Pride indeed.

Out Hutchison Drive
Tractors, trucks, cars and bikes
Growing food for life

Scorching summer suns
Windy wet whooshing winters
Hundred year climate

Socks and Birkenstocks
Centennial clock tick-tock
Aggies don’t wear out

Block C A before
Block C A forever more
Cowed and plowed for sure

Fear my Aggie pride
Davis plates on my Bentley
Skatin’ twenty-twos

UCD stands for
Under Construction Daily
That’s a good thing, right?

Always healthy food
The Davis Student Co-op
Good friends for life!

Whole Earth Festival
Need I say anything else
Life celebration

Picnic Day for all
Friends, free hot dogs and football
Alumns heed the call

A S U C D
Long Debates in the Mee Room
Resolutions passed!

Followed horse mascot
To secret winter banquet
Sworn to number nine

Fall Causeway Classic
Sac State Soucks the Big One Ooh
Go UC Davis

I’m an Ag always
not just when celebrating
the centennial

Egghead irony
Theibaud’s sugar confections
Aggie artistic eye

edible foliage
hobbit homes and a bike church
only at Davis

My dad farmed the Quad.
I designed machinery.
My sons farm info.

Emil was so right.
About students being first.
Wisdom. Thanks Emil.

A.M. formation
5 mile run and pushups
Thank you Coffee House

Its not big and new
Instead it has history
Good ol Hickey Gym

You get used to it
They say my dorm is the worst
Tercero, you stink

New MU is nice
Wow, I get my own office
Do the students know?

Bang the gavel down
Senate meeting running long
We’ve got other plans

The bikes still go ’round
Blue and Gold still shine proudly
One hundred still strong

Leafy tree lined streets
Freshman girls in Spring dresses
Davis Memories

Nothing quite compares
To flying candy and socks
On cool autumn nights

Aggie pride runs deep
Like the roots of mighty oaks
In shady Shields Grove

heat shade quad green trees
wellman bainer olson pigs
games movies beer ags

late assignment due
poem of davis, gold and blue
perfection haiku

The Lincoln Highway
Over a century old
Links two great places

Coho Iced Coffee
Centennial Walk Morning
It’s Fall on the Quad

Horses and hoedowns
Helped build an institution
For the centuries

Chancellors Freeborn,
Mrak, Meyer, Vanderhoef all
milked cows, except Hullar

Celebrate today
One hundred years – whoopee!
Future calls us, now

Happy Hundred Time
Aggie Pride U C D Love
Bikes, Trees, memories

to one hundred more
sword and sandals don’t keep score
we add to the lore

One double zero
At the 95616
Fo shizzle yo dizzle

A true legacy
think tank of innovation
Study hard, play hard

We ride in Davis
A Hundred years more to come
Bikes all around town

Eating on the Quad
Crossword in the back of class
Ah, I miss Davis

“Hi Aggie” spirit
Honor system holds our pride
That’s the way it was

Bicycle – explore
Olives plopped on quiet paths
Stop for cherries – yum!

Ducks in dorm hallway
“Study Table” – time to work
Do ducks go to school?

Arboretum ducks
Raucous quacks, fast swimming feet
Golden sunset, peace

Dean, Emil, Gene
Breakfast Stories El Rodeos
Agatheragus

There was an Aggie
Blue Gold Pride Hard Working True
Gunrock, Nine, Cal Ags

Study, books, papers
“What’s a bluebook?” freshmen ask
Oh, what innocence!

One hundred great years
We have only just begun
Aggie Family Pride!

Coffeehouse signage
“No munch money accepted”
New frosh tradition

Painting yourself blue
UCD fan through and through
Love for Aggies true

Beautiful campus
Quad cork oaks long-enduring
My time was too swift

Century of school
Centennial of learning
Repetitive, yup

Graduation day
Joyful friends departing soon
Amazing, but true

Rain comes down in sheets
The dreaded Freshman Bike Stripes
Flash out like light beams

loving the coho
celebrating forty years
within a hundred

the truest Aggies
call Social Sci the “Death Star”
up for hide and seek?

the greatest danger
a freshman learning to ride
just go with the flow

friends with many views
late nights spent studying at Shields
cozy college town

Yo, one double oh
Gotta go, ya know, flow, flow
Blue to the gold, word

ducklings hatching soon
it’s the highlight of the spring
a new year goes by

one hundred years down
cal davis pride, tried and true
one hundred to come

Centennial walk
Shade of trees anchored beneath
Leaves whispering above

Aggies, we’re so odd
Working hard to help others
For such little pay

The Antique Tractors
UC Davis reminder
Of our deep ag roots

Tank Rush, Frosh-Soph Brawl
Bossy Cow Cow, Dinks, Go Ags
Pajamarino

Along Putah Creek
Walks in the arboretum
To escape the stress

Meeting at the flagpole
Lunching at the Coffee House
Lounging on the Quad

play it one more time
warmerdam you ole cash hound
hit it decarli

Aggie family
Bike crashes and helping hands
Big smiles, Blue and Gold

bikes and trikes some ride
oh that uc davis pride
Aggies are bona fide

Shining Bright in Cal
“Agricultrully” Advanced
UC Davis Rules

Quad trees on the lawn
Home to UC Davis life
One hundred more years

In the past, faculty members were often hired to address research missions, teaching and training.  These functions were supported to a large extent by the institution.  In recent years due to funding cuts in state support and increase in costs of doing research this loyalty has been diluted.  Much more of the funding comes from national organizations in which the research agenda is set by national needs and not the mission of the state educational unit. 

This has affected both the direction of research and the hiring of faculty.  Too often a faculty member is hired for their ability to obtain competitive grants from national organizations and not from local institutions.  This results in a faculty, by necessity, focused on where the next grant is coming from and not the mission of their institution. 

The statement has been made that a faculty position at UCDavis is a professional appointment with a hunting license.  The behavior of a collegial unit reflects this change in a number of ways.  The social interaction is reduced.  The Faculty (University) Club was closed, primarily due to lower utilization and a reduction in support from the Campus.  As a result faculty functions such as Goose Stew, Crab Feed, Wine Festival, and Steak Bake are no longer available for faculty to promote social interaction.  This in turn appears to reduce interaction across disciplines and administrative units. Only recently, however, the Emeriti/Retiree Associations sponsored a Steak Bake which was well received and supported.  The intent is to open this up to the general faculty. 

The attendance at Academic Senate meetings has dwindled.  We as a faculty have contributed to the changes.  The need to obtain funding focuses our attention and energy on non campus activities.  We have reduced our effort in self governance and participatory democracy leading to more of the governance done by the administration.  This may partially reflect the effect of a rapid increase in student numbers; however, it appears to have led to a faculty loyal to external forces and has reduced our commitment to the institution.  I find this situation less collegial and potentially destructive of the role of an institution of higher learning.

I have to provide a caveat.   Personally I have had a very satisfactory and rewarding career at UCDavis.  The students were highly motivated, teaching was very satisfying, research was stimulating and exciting and I have made life-long friends within the faculty and staff of this institution.  As a faculty member I feel I was treated fairly and rewarded for my efforts.  

We commonly reflect on the “good old days”.  In this case, however, I am convinced that the changes in the last forty years are not necessarily the best for our institution.  Maybe this is what change is all about; make room for the individuals who have to make their way in the environment that has evolved from past efforts.

Go Ags

Bill Rains

view the full story with photos and graphics

Otherwise, here’s the text:

Suicides a symptom of larger UC crisis

As more students with mental health problems enroll, campuses lack the resources to cope.

By Richard C. Paddock, Times Staff Writer
May 23, 2007

DAVIS, CALIF. — As 20-year-old Jennifer Tse was dying in January, she typed a message on her laptop to the coroner’s investigators she expected would examine her body. The lonely UC Davis sophomore, depressed and struggling with her studies, had swallowed cold pills, antidepressants, dishwashing liquid and insect po

“It’s kind of rather sad, it’s no way out,” she wrote as she described her blurred vision, shaking muscles and a sense that her head was detached from her body. “Hopefully my IQ will stay at the same level. If I end up dead, then oh well.”

For five days, no one seemed to notice her absence until her roommate realized something was amiss, used a screwdriver to open the locked door to Tse’s room and found her body on the floor.

Tse’s death is another grim statistic in what university administrators say is an escalating mental health crisis on campuses across the nation.

She was one of at least nine students who committed suicide at UC Davis during the last three academic years. Her death came four months after a high-level UC committee concluded that the university’s overtaxed mental health services fell “significantly short” and that the 10-campus system must urgently expand its counseling programs.

“We have had an increasing number of students with serious mental health problems while services are lacking,” said UC Santa Barbara Vice Chancellor Michael Young, co-chairman of the Student Mental Health Committee. “We just don’t have the appropriate level of support to have healthy campuses.”

The increase in mental health problems at UC is part of a national trend arising from the growing stress of university life and the growing number of students who arrive at college already under treatment for mental illness, university psychologists and officials say.

Advances in drug treatment mean that many students with psychological disorders who could not have coped with campus life a generation ago now go on to college.

The number of students seeking counseling at the eight main undergraduate campuses (not including UC San Francisco and the new UC Merced) rose 23% during 2000-01 to 2004-05 from 12,384 students to 15,285 students.

At UC, a quarter of the students who seek counseling are already on psychotropic medication. Many are being treated for depression and anxiety, some for bipolar disorder.

Crises often occur when students, on their own for the first time, decide to experiment and go off their medications. It also is an age when undiagnosed psychological disorders can emerge.

Across the country, about 1,300 college students a year commit suicide, experts say. Though university students are less likely than other age and occupational groups to take their own lives, suicide remains their second-leading cause of death.

The UC Student Mental Health Committee called for “aggressive intervention” to reverse years of budget cuts in mental health services, double the counseling staff and implement dozens of recommendations to improve campus mental health care. UC needs 104 new psychologists just to meet national guidelines, administrators say.

The UC Board of Regents received the report in September and in March agreed to designate part of an increase in student fees for mental health services. But that amount, about $4.6 million next year, will allow the campuses to hire only a fraction of the psychologists the panel recommended.

“Have we done enough? No, everyone agrees,” Young said.

For campus counselors who deal daily with depressed and disturbed students, the April 16 massacre and suicide at Virginia Tech by deranged student Seng-hui Cho was the realization of their worst nightmare. But on a daily basis, campus counselors are stretched thin trying to help students who are recovering from traumatic breakups, suffering from eating disorders or who intentionally cut themselves. At the same time, counselors must cope with students who disrupt classes, create disturbances in residence halls or stalk women.

“There are more troubled kids, that’s the bottom line,” said Elizabeth Downing, who heads the UC Santa Barbara health center. “We boomer generation parents have not done a good job in a way. We were so laid back. Now there’s so much stress. I think we’ve done our children a great disservice. They are driven in every part of their lives.”

At UC Berkeley, 45% of students surveyed in 2004 said they had experienced an emotional problem in the previous 12 months that significantly affected their wellbeing or academic performance. Nearly 10% said they had seriously contemplated suicide.

At UC Santa Barbara a decade ago, an average of 21 students a quarter came to the counseling center to report they were experiencing an emotional crisis. Now, more than 200 students a quarter come for help, saying they are in a crisis.

“Our crises have gone way up and we have fewer psychologists to deal with that,” said Jeanne Stanford, director of counseling services. “We feel like we have become a crisis center.”

UC has about one psychologist for every 2,300 students, far below the International Assn. of Counseling Services guideline of one psychologist for every 1,000 to 1,500 students.

*

Lengthy wait for help

For UC students with nonemergency problems, the wait to see a counselor is three to six weeks — a long time when a quarter is only 11 weeks long.

“There are many students who are on the edge,” UC President Robert Dynes said. “We are spending less and we have more kids with fewer services.”

The mental health committee reported that there were 29 confirmed suicides at UC campuses from 2000 to 2005. Panel members say that number is low because some suicides go unreported to the university and other suspected suicides are not confirmed.

It’s not just students who have killed themselves. UC’s highest-profile suicide occurred in June when UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Denice Dee Denton jumped from the roof of her partner’s 43-story apartment building in San Francisco.

One of UC’s worst tragedies occurred at Santa Barbara in 2001 when student David Attias drove his car into a crowd of pedestrians in the student community of Isla Vista, killing four people. He claimed he was the “angel of death.”

Attias had been on medication since the age of 11 for bipolar disorder and other conditions. After his arrest, he said he had stopped taking his drugs because he wanted to be like other students.

In hopes of preventing similar incidents, UCSB now collects information on students who may be troubled and intervenes if they begin acting out. Like other schools, Santa Barbara has a crisis response team that includes police officers, counselors and administrators.

Other campuses are also focusing on prevention. UC Berkeley, through a federal grant, has trained nearly 600 faculty, staff members and students to spot signs of depression and posted green stickers across the campus to show students where they can get help.

The UC system began examining campus mental health after the death of Adam Ojakian, a 21-year-old senior at UC Davis who shot himself in 2004. Suffering from depression and struggling academically, he received a letter from the university warning that his graduation could be jeopardized by his poor grades.

Ojakian’s parents, Victor and Mary Ojakian, believe his suicide — like most suicides — could have been prevented if his symptoms had been recognized and he had received treatment. Unlike many relatives of suicide victims, the Ojakians have spoken out publicly about their son’s problems.

Victor Ojakian, a Palo Alto councilman at the time of his son’s death, said one of the biggest obstacles in preventing suicides is overcoming the stigma of mental illness.

“We have a major health crisis and nobody wants to talk about it because of our cultural adversity to talking about problems involving the brain,” he said.

Frustrated by UC’s lack of action, the Ojakians got the regents’ attention at one of their meetings in 2005, speaking during the brief public comment period. Their plea led to the appointment of the Student Mental Health Committee and its subsequent report.

Victor Ojakian praised the panel’s recommendations but said the amount of money allocated by the regents would fund only a “bare minimum” of increased services.

“It won’t address the second tier — reaching at-risk men and women — because that costs more,” he said. “The Virginia Tech type of individual would go undetected with this kind of money.”

At UC, officials have held to the idea that mental health treatment should be paid for with the student registration fee, which has been stagnant for decades.

That fee, which pays for student services, rose gradually from $510 in 1985-86 to $735 this year. By contrast, the education fee, the main fee students pay, rose over the same period from $723 to $5,046.

As state funding for UC decreased, mental health services were cut in the early ’90s and again this decade.

In March, the regents agreed to raise both fees by 7%, with more than half the increase in the registration fee going to mental health services. But advocates say much more is needed.

“We are already a decade and a half behind,” Young said. “What you saw at the regents’ meeting was a very small first step.”

UC officials would not discuss Jennifer Tse’s suicide and her parents did not return telephone calls from The Times. It was unclear whether she sought or received treatment from the UC Davis counseling center.

But Emil Rodolfa, who heads the center, said that it’s easy for a depressed student to go unnoticed on the campus of 30,000, the third-largest in the UC system.

“Depression sucks the life out of you,” he said. “It causes people to withdraw and hide out. In these huge classes, it’s hard to tell if a student is there or not.”

The report on Tse’s death filed by the Yolo County coroner’s office described her as “a highly intelligent young woman who held herself to very high standards in her personal life as well as her studies.”

She had a long history of depression, was prescribed Prozac and Wellbutrin and attempted suicide in high school, the report says.

After starting at Davis, she took some time off and attended community college before returning last summer. On Sunday, Jan. 14, three days before her death, she wrote in her diary: “I’m sooo lonely, so lonely. What shall I do bah bah and I must finish this paper, I must type. What can I type. I must type … I have to wait until wed. to see if I can call a counselor … I feel rather discouraged right now…. ”

It’s unclear whether she ever called the counselor. But that Wednesday night she swallowed whatever toxic items she could find in her apartment.

“Okay, I think the meds are working,” she wrote. “I think I will lie down and see what happens.”

*richard.paddock@latimes.com

When the Aggies take the field this fall they’ll do so in a new stadium and when the team runs through the tunnel to the tune of Aggie Fight and the roar of the crowd, the story of the day deserves to be about more than construction delays, the lack of a corporate sponsor and a switch to athlete-friendly monofilament turf. The story must be about our students.

The stadium, in no insignificant way, is a jewel in the crown of the UC Davis student experience - a pure embodiment of Aggie Pride. In 1999 students conceptualized, debated, and voted in favor of the Facilities and Campus Enhancements (FACE) initiative, providing new student funds for the Schaal Aquatics Center, the Activities and Recreation Center, the stadium and other campus improvements. UC Davis student leaders have a long history of promoting such visionary campus improvement, as earlier generations of students led the way on fee referendums that helped construct the Memorial Union, Silo and Recreation Hall.

But as student leaders graduate and become less and less involved with the University, other institutional pressures can begin to chip away at the legacy they worked so hard to ensure. When conceptualized, student use of the Activities and Recreation Center was to be entirely covered by the FACE initiative’s increase in registration fees, however students who want to participate in exercise classes or maintain a locker must now pay additional fees. A student wanting to enjoy the original vision of the facility - unlimited access to ARC’s equipment and programmatic offerings – must purchase the “Fitness Intensive Pass” for an additional $45.00 per quarter.

The stadium’s debut will mark the completion of the FACE initiative’s major projects, and because of this it serves as the perfect opportunity for our Aggie family to review how well we’ve implemented the original vision of those student leaders that helped create it. It also serves as an excellent opportunity to increase our efforts at making sure the student component of the FACE legacy is preserved and shared in a meaningful way with future student leaders.

University administrators, now the primary stewards of FACE funding, owe current students an open and publicized accounting of ARC fees, as well as a publicized accounting of why design and construction delays have led to the stadium opening a year behind schedule. If cost projections contained in FACE simply did not meet the real construction and operational costs of its facilities, then how does the University plan to ensure the next student led expansion initiative avoid similar miscalculation and oversight? Are such lessons being shared with our peer institutions?

Almost as much as the game of college football itself, the coach’s pre-game pep talk is a mythical opportunity in American folklore. In “Farm vs. Farm”, the documentary short on the historic UC Davis upset of Stanford, Bob Biggs tells his players that Aggie football is about pride and playing for each other, and that this team in particular is fortunate because they get the opportunity to play the game so many of their predecessors dreamed about. The stadium opening, however, merits a pep talk that motivates beyond the tradition of those that once wore the uniform.

This fall, and frankly every fall thereafter, the students deserve center stage – the students that time and time again have supported their athletic peers with referendums to fund a vibrant and proud athletic tradition. The same students that will pay over time two-thirds of the cost of the new home of Aggie football, some $21,000,000 of the now $30,885,000 budget. This is the base of Aggie Pride.

One day a corporate sponsor may come along and buy naming rights to the stadium, and that donation should be duly recognized and appreciated, but let it never be forgotten who truly funded this long awaited home of Aggie football and its sister campus enhancements. Let those of us – alumni and administrators – entrusted with its stewardship never sell short the legacy of the UC Davis student experience and the extraordinary progress UC Davis students have contributed to our campus community.